Major Construction on Hwy. 1 Could Be Commuting Nightmare
Work begins next week, but the real slowdowns will start in the summer with the closing of the La Fonda bridge.
Trees will start to come down next week along Highway 1 in Santa Cruz and actual construction will start in March, but the real headaches in widening each direction of the freeway to three lanes between Morrissey Boulevard and Soquel Drive won't start until June.
That was the take-away from a kick-off meeting about the transportation project held Thursday.
Starting around June 15, Highway 1 will be entirely shutdown at night in that area for 7-10 days while CalTrans crews tear down the overpass to fit the newly-widened road.
Regional Transportation Commission officials said this will be the only closure during the 15-month project to add a third lane to both the north and southbound directions.
“There will probably be a period of hours when that will happen at night,” said RTC Chairperson Kirby Nichol. “We are very sensitive to people that need to go to school, to work and to the hospital.”
The 50 or so attendees at the “project kick-off” meeting at DeLaveaga Elementary School in Santa Cruz on Thursday asked several questions that stumped RTC officials, such as how students would get to schools with the bridge closed and how people on one side of the freeway would catch buses on the other.
They said they would post answers on their website in coming weeks, and designated Public Information Coordinator Karena Pushnik as the person to address further questions to.
The La Fonda bridge rebuild was the biggest concern for many residents. That part of the project will take between six and eight months with construction beginning sometime in June after nearby schools are on summer vacation. This will, however, affect Harbor High School and DeLaveaga Elementary students this fall who cross the bridge to go to class.
“Have you thought about alternative routes and the number of shuttles [you will provide] for students to take next winter when the La Fonda bridge is down?” asked DeLaveaga Principal Ruth Smith.
Some people complained that what is now an eight-minute walk to get to a bus or to the school would be a half an hour walk to cross at Morrissey.
RTC Project Manager Kim Shultz said that they don't have a set plan for the number of shuttles or the routes they will travel, and will be studying that over the next month.
Residents in the Prospect Heights area who need to catch the bus on Soquel Avenue asked if those shuttles could be made available to them. Shultz said he will look into that possibility.
Traffic flowing off the freeway into neighborhoods is already a problem with the freeway as it is, residents said. Some asked if there was a plan to deal with intensification as people get off the freeway to escape the lower speed limits in the construction zone. RTC Executive Director George Dondero said that “cut through traffic” has always been a problem, but hopes people will stay on the freeway and “obey the lower speed limits.”
Email and notifications to the press will be used to alert the public of partial or complete shutdowns, they said.
Many in the meeting were concerned about plans to cut down about 200 trees and its effects on wildlife. The transportation officials said the trees would be replaced three times over, with 600 native California trees replacing foreign eucalyptus and acacia.
Officials will begin clearing trees out next week before birds build nests in them.
“One part we are very proud of is the plant list," said Shultz. "Over 150 coast redwoods will be planted along this section.”
As with any proposed change in Santa Cruz, there were three people outside the meeting protesting the widening. Santa Cruz High School student and People Power activist Zoe Altenberg was outside burning photo copies of $5 bills to make her statement that the $18 million highway widening is “a massive waste of money.”
She was joined by attorney Jim Danaher of Live Oak who said that most of the traffic is caused by the 26,000 people who commute to work on Highway 17.
“I am not opposed to people having that lifestyle, but for all of them to drive over there by themselves is incredibly wasteful,” said Danaher. “I would like to see more buses and carpooling networks.”
How will you handle the road closure? What can they do to make it better? Tell us in the comments!
Michael A. Lewis
8:50 am on Friday, January 20, 2012
Widening highways does not reduce congestion.
Numerous studies in Calfiornia clearly demonstrate that more highway lanes lead to more traffic and more cars standing in more congested roadways.
The answer to highway congestion is fewer cars, not more. This unconscionable waste of public money would better be directed to making our communities walkable and bikeable, increasing opportunities for work close to home, and increasing the convenience of public transportation. These factors actually reduce traffic and thus congestion.
Peking
10:51 am on Friday, January 20, 2012
Michael, I would love to read the studies to which you refer. Post a couple of links to them.
Meanwhile, widening to enable traffic to flow more efficiently through these sections of Highway 1 is essential. When I return from doing business in Palo Alto or visiting family in Berkeley, I do not like to send 25-50 minutes stopped in traffic between Santa Cruz and Aptos in order to get home. I can not walk or bike between the Bay area and home.
With current traffic conditions If I were a student trying to get to evening classes at Cabrillo College from Santa Cruz or San Lorenzo or Scotts Valley whether on a bus or in a carpool, I would have to leave home an hour an a half before class to be on time.
frobert
5:39 pm on Friday, January 20, 2012
Pipe dream man. People need to travel with more than their dreamweavers for their daily jobs and errands. If you are in need of no more than but a bike for transportation ride on! Please don't choke the rest of those in need of vehicle transportation with your wants!
Would you pay extra for a contractor to bike home improvement materials to your home, or have Rooter Rooter walk on over when you plug your toilet?
Barbara S F Davis
9:19 am on Friday, January 20, 2012
Michael Lewis has stated the truth.
Jacob Bourne
11:16 am on Friday, January 20, 2012
Michael, I, like Peking, would be really interested to see those studies too, if you've got any access to them. I'm certainly no traffic expert. My primitive traffic mind thinks more lanes means fewer cars per lane. Can anyone explain why that's not right?
Michael A. Lewis
2:42 pm on Friday, January 20, 2012
In a nutshell, it doesn't matter how many lanes there are when traffic exceeds capacity. Cars bunch up and slow down across all lanes, espcially where there are corners (think: Fishhook), obstructions and distractions. How many times have you encountered creeping traffic on the Interstate miles from any development and seen no apparent cause?
The state cannot build enough lanes on Highway 1/17 to handle the peak flow traffic. There will always be congestion during peak flow.
Michael A. Lewis
12:29 pm on Friday, January 20, 2012
Glad to oblige. For an overview of the subject of "Induced Travel," go to http://sensibletransportation.org/induced.php
The City's own Master Transportation study concludes: "When road capacity is increased, total travel time will ultimately equalize over time, until traffic moves at the previous levels of congestion" http://www.cityofsantacruz.com/index.aspx?page=113
Read more about induced auto travel here: http://sensibletransportation.org/pdf/noland.pdf
And, the Campaign for Sensible Tranportation paper on induced travel is here: http://sensibletransportation.org/pdf/fallacies.pdf
Peking
1:55 pm on Friday, January 20, 2012
Michael, none of the links you provided is an unbiased scientific study, especially sensibletransportation.org.
Michael A. Lewis
2:38 pm on Friday, January 20, 2012
I have yet to see an unbiased scientific study. We all have biases. The best we can do is proclaim our biases as a preamble to our studies.
Such as this:
http://www.cts.cv.ic.ac.uk/documents/publications/iccts00029.pdf
and this:
http://www.cts.cv.ic.ac.uk/documents/publications/iccts00003.pdf
or this: http://www.calicomovamos.org.co/calicomovamos/files/Escuchando%20Expertos/TD-Induced-Demand.pdf
Stop me when you've read enough!
There's this (with formulae): http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/steam/doc.htm
and this: http://jpl.sagepub.com/content/17/1/3.abstract
Peking
3:43 pm on Friday, January 20, 2012
Michael, thanks for the reading list. I've learned a lot about induced traffic. However, we still need more lanes on Highway 1. They may not get rid of all congestion at all times, but the time spent sitting in a vehicle at a complete standstill even during peak flow will definitely be less.
Unfortunately, the geography of the area means that there is one main freeway wedged between the ocean and the mountains. There are no secondary arteries because of that physical fact.
Michael A. Lewis
4:07 pm on Friday, January 20, 2012
Building more traffic lanes is a shallow response to highway congestion. It's like continuing to pull drowning people out of a river without investigating why they keep falling in.
Building more traffic lanes has never worked anywhere to reduce traffic congestion. Why keeping doing something that obviously doesn't work?
Peking
4:44 pm on Friday, January 20, 2012
Well first, my response is shallow because I am incredibly shallow. Second, building more lanes doesn't eliminate congestion, but it does reduce it. Third, I can't help but pull drowning folks out of the water; I don't ask how they got there. Chow.
Ashley S.
5:20 pm on Friday, January 20, 2012
Burn all the roads!!! Let's walk everywhere!!!
RTC Staff
5:31 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
For information about the Highway 1 Soquel/Morrissey Auxiliary Lanes project -- including maps, schedule, right of way, environmental review, and construction activities -- please see the project web page: http://sccrtc.org/projects/streets-highways/highway-1-aux-lanes/
itsmecissy
11:08 am on Monday, February 6, 2012
I'm one of those lucky people (or unlucky depending on your point of view) who must drive to San Jose for work 5 days a week; I cannot ride a bike or walk to work - as much as I'd like to.
I rode the Hwy 17 bus for a number of years after the Loma Prieta earthquake when it cost me $2 a day. It's now $10 per day for a day pass. I also rode CALTrain from Gilroy to downtown San Jose for over three years. It cost me $2.25 per day; sometimes I'd get a monthly pass for $25, and that was a deal until CALTrain raised their fares and cut station arrivals & departures. That fare today is $13.50 for a day pass for travel within 3 zones. Not to mention that I had to get up at 3:30am and drove from Watsonville the 15 miles or so to Gilroy via Hecker Pass. Yes, I've even looked into vanpooling, but again, I'd still have to drive to Scotts Valley to catch one.
I have been carpooling for years but my carpooling mate retired this past September and I'm on my own again. I take Hwy 17 into work, before 6am, and drive home via Hwy 101 & Hecker Pass, after 5pm.
Widening Hwy 1 may not see seem like the answer to the congestion but I do believe it will help. It used to be said that "if you build it, they will come." Well, "they" (people from "over the hill) are already here and that fact must be faced. Call me shallow like "Peking."
And btw, a taxi ride from Gilroy to the SJ Tamien station is $124, not including tip so don't go thinking I haven't looked at all the options.