Santa Cruz Earns ‘D’ for Its Tobacco Policies

The state of California also received failing grades from the American Lung Association.

The American Lung Association in California gave the city of Santa Cruz a D rating for its tobacco policies — tied for the worst of any city in Santa Cruz County.

The annual report, which was released Wednesday, issues grades for all cities and counties in California on local tobacco control policies including those for smokefree outdoor environments, smokefree housing, and reducing sales of tobacco products.

Overall, the association said the state of California "falls short in adequately funding tobacco prevention programs to protect children and curb tobacco-caused disease." California earned an A grade for its smokefree air policies but received a D for its low cigarette tax, an F for failing to adequately fund tobacco prevention and control programs, and another F for poor coverage of smoking cessation and treatment services.

“Cities and counties in California have always led the way with strong tobacco control policies, and that continues to this day,” said Fred Lurmann, Chair of the Leadership Board of the American Lung Association in California – Greater Bay Area. “Safeguarding our communities from the negative consequences of tobacco is critical. The low grades represent real health consequences.”

The association also criticized the state for not increasing its cigarette tax since 1999 and spending only 15 percent of what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends to adequately fund tobacco prevention programs and services to help people quit smoking.

There are about 3 million new youth smokers in the U.S. and 34,400 in California every year. About 37,000 deaths are caused by tobacco use, according to the U.S. Surgeon General.

“We need to do more to fight the influence of tobacco interests in California politics,” said American Lung Association in California Chairwoman Marsha Ramos. “Our state elected officials have an opportunity to change course in 2013 and make big strides in the fight to end tobacco-caused death and disease. It’s going to take a great deal of political will, but we are confident our elected officials are up to the challenge. Our children’s health is depending on them.”

Santa Cruz County State of Tobacco Control 2013 Overall Grade Smokefree Outdoor Air Smokefree Housing Reducing Sales of Tobacco Prodcuts Watsonville B B D A Scotts Valley D C D F Santa Cruz D B D F Capitola D C D F Unincorporated County C D D A

To view the complete California report, visit www.lung.org/california.

John Hernlund January 17, 2013 at 04:28 PM
The multitude of tobacco taxes and manufacturer lawsuits were supposed to fund education and prevention programs for youth, and subsidize aid to help addicted smokers quit...wonder where all those billions went instead?
CC Clark January 17, 2013 at 09:28 PM
What grade does Santa Cruz get for having too many gangs in the area! Let check that. The kids and people that smoke will continue until they stop! Grade how safe citizens are with out a gun..Funny you want to ban guns but yet who you gonna call when you need protection? Yep a cop with a gun, if he's near you then he might be able to save you from someone shooting you…but who wants to wait when your life is in jeopardy. It takes only a second for gun to be pointed at you and the trigger is pulled. Make our community safe by banning the gun free areas so we have citizens who can help protect us when they have a carry license. Just a thought.
Mike Hubert March 24, 2013 at 04:01 PM
If the funds are going to help any youth or teen organizations, they certainly are not advertising it. Which makes me wonder. Regards, Mike Hubert http://herbalchew.org


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »